Effect of stepped care on health outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis: an observational study in Dutch general practice.

  • Home / Effect of stepped care on health outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis: an observational study in Dutch general practice.

Effect of stepped care on health outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis: an observational study in Dutch general practice.

Related Articles

Effect of stepped care on health outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis: an observational study in Dutch general practice.

Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Sep;64(626):e538-44

Authors: Smink AJ, van den Ende CH, Vliet Vlieland TP, Bijlsma JW, Swierstra BA, Kortland JH, Voorn TB, Teerenstra S, Schers HJ, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM

Abstract
BACKGROUND: A stepped care strategy (SCS) to improve adequate healthcare use in patients with osteoarthritis was developed and implemented in a primary care region in the Netherlands.
AIM: To assess the association between care that is in line with the SCS recommendations and health outcomes.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were used from a 2-year observational study of 313 patients who had consulted their GP because of osteoarthritis.
METHOD: Care was considered ‘SCS-consistent’ if all advised modalities of the previous steps of the SCS were offered before more advanced modalities of subsequent steps. Pain and physical function were measured with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (range 0-100); active pain coping with the Pain Coping Inventory (range 10-40); and self-efficacy with the Dutch General Self-Efficacy Scale (range 12-48). Crude and adjusted associations between SCS-consistent care and outcomes were estimated with generalised estimating equations.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in changes over a 2-year period in pain and physical function between patients who received SCS-inconsistent care (n = 163) and patients who received SCS-consistent care (n = 117). This was also the case after adjusting for possible confounders, that is, -4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -10.3 to 1.7) and -1.9 (95% CI = -7.0 to 3.1), respectively. Furthermore, no differences were found in changes over time between groups in self-efficacy and pain coping.
CONCLUSION: The results raised several important issues that need to be considered regarding the value of the SCS, such as the reasons that GPs provide SCS-inconsistent care, the long-term effects of the SCS, and the effects on costs and side effects.

PMID: 25179067 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

About Post Author

Medical CPD & News

The Digitalis CPD trawler searches the web for all the latest news and journals.

Privacy Preference Center

Close your account?

Your account will be closed and all data will be permanently deleted and cannot be recovered. Are you sure?

Are you sure?

By disagreeing you will no longer have access to our site and will be logged out.